Fćrsluflokkur: Stjórnmál og samfélag

ICELAND, DON'T DO IT!

Nigel Farage1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nigel Farage


ICELAND
, DON'T DO IT! - NIGEL FARAGE MEP


LESEFNI FYRIR JÓHÖNNU OG ÖSSUR.

bukovsky 1Vladimir Bukovksy, former Soviet dissident

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Vladimir Konstantinovich Bukovsky

 

FYRIR 5+1/2 ÁRI VARAĐI VLADIMIR KONSTANTINOVICH BUKOVSKY FYRRUM ANDÓFSMAĐUR OG FYRRUM FANGI OG RÍKISBORGARI GÖMLU SOVÉTRÍKJANNA (USSR) VIĐ ALGJÖRUM YFIRRÁĐUM EVRÓPUSAMBANDSINS OG SAGĐI ŢAĐ VERA SKRÍMSLI SEM YRĐI AĐ EYĐILEGGJA SEM FYRST.  HANN ÓTTAĐIST AĐ SAMBANDIĐ VĆRI AĐ VERĐA AĐ NÝJUM SOVÉTRÍKJUM.  RĆĐAN HANS Á ENN FULLT ERINDI.

Vladimir Bukovksy, the 63-year old former Soviet dissident, fears that the European Union is on its way to becoming another Soviet Union. In a speech he delivered in Brussels last week Mr Bukovsky called the EU a “monster” that must be destroyed, the sooner the better, before it develops into a fullfledged totalitarian state.

HLUTI ÚR RĆĐU HANS:  

It looks like we are living in a period of rapid, systematic and very consistent dismantlement of democracy. Look at this Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill. It makes ministers into legislators who can introduce new laws without bothering to tell Parliament or anyone. My immediate reaction is why do we need it? Britain survived two world wars, the war with Napoleon, the Spanish Armada, not to mention the Cold War, when we were told at any moment we might have a nuclear world war, without any need for introducing this kind legislation, without the need for suspending our civil liberaties and introducing emergency powers. Why do we need it right now? This can make a dictatorship out of your country in no time.

Today’s situation is really grim. Major political parties have been completely taken in by the new EU project. None of them really opposes it. They have become very corrupt. Who is going to defend our freedoms? It looks like we are heading towards some kind of collapse, some kind of crisis. The most likely outcome is that there will be an economic collapse in Europe, which in due time is bound to happen with this growth of expenses and taxes. The inability to create a competitive environment, the overregulation of the economy, the bureaucratisation, it is going to lead to economic collapse. Particularly the introduction of the euro was a crazy idea. Currency is not supposed to be political.

I have no doubt about it. There will be a collapse of the European Union pretty much like the Soviet Union collapsed. But do not forget that when these things collapse they leave such devastation that it takes a generation to recover. Just think what will happen if it comes to an economic crisis. The recrimination between nations will be huge. It might come to blows. Look to the huge number of immigrants from Third World countries now living in Europe. This was promoted by the European Union. What will happen with them if there is an economic collapse? We will probably have, like in the Soviet Union at the end, so much ethnic strife that the mind boggles. In no other country were there such ethnic tensions as in the Soviet Union, except probably in Yugoslavia. So that is exactly what will happen here, too. We have to be prepared for that. This huge edifice of bureaucracy is going to collapse on our heads.

This is why, and I am very frank about it, the sooner we finish with the EU the better. The sooner it collapses the less damage it will have done to us and to other countries. But we have to be quick because the Eurocrats are moving very fast. It will be difficult to defeat them. Today it is still simple. If one million people march on Brussels today these guys will run away to the Bahamas. If tomorrow half of the British population refuses to pay its taxes, nothing will happen and no-one will go to jail. Today you can still do that. But I do not know what the situation will be tomorrow with a fully fledged Europol staffed by former Stasi or Securitate officers. Anything may happen.

We are losing time. We have to defeat them. We have to sit and think, work out a strategy in the shortest possible way to achieve maximum effect. Otherwise it will be too late. So what should I say? My conclusion is not optimistic. So far, despite the fact that we do have some anti-EU forces in almost every country, it is not enough. We are losing and we are wasting time.

HANN VARAĐI OKKUR VIĐ SKAĐRĆĐIS-STJÓRNMÁLAMÖNNUM EINS OG JÓHÖNNU, ÖSSURI OG CO.  STEINGRÍMUR GETUR SAGT ŢEIM HVAĐ ŢETTA ŢÝĐIR.  HANN ĆTTI AĐ VITA.

HVÍ FĆR BJÖRGÓLFUR THOR AĐ VAĐA UM LANDIĐ?

ICESAVE RAT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MOUSE OR RAT? 

 

ICESAVE RAT1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hví ćttu menn eins og Björgólfur Thor, búandi í öđru landi í langan tíma ađ fá ađ reka banka, gagnaver og lyfjafyrirtćki, etc, í landinu?  Og ţó ţeir hafi ekki formlega gefiđ upp ríkisborgararéttinn?  Ćttu ekki ađ vera lagaleg mörk fyrir fjárfestingaleyfi brottfluttra manna í landinu?

Mađurinn býr í Bretlandi, nánar tiltekiđ í London, Englandi.  Og borgar skatta ţar.  Fyrir 3 árum var hann 29. ríkasti mađur Bretlands.  Samt notfćrir hann sér ađ hann er enn tćknilega ríkisborgari Íslands.  Og kemst upp međ ţađ.

Hann fćr ađ valsa um eins og hann eigi landiđ.  Og okra međ háu lyfjaverđi á gamalmennum og sjúklingum.  Hann fćr ađ vađa um í bönkum og grafa undan stođunum.

 

Hann, langstćrsti eigandi ICESAVE hrollvekjubankans, býr í kúgunarlandi okkar í ICESAVE-málinu.  Já, af öllum löndum.  Hví fćr hann annars ađ búa ţar verandi íslenskur ríkisborgari??  Vegna EES-samningsins?

Svipađ verđur sagt um nokkra ađra refi sem óđu um allt á skítugum skóm og tćmdu banka ađ innan á kostnađ landsmanna.  Ýmist beint eđa óbeint í gegnum ehf flćkjur og millifćrslur.  Stjórnmálamenn sem vit hafa ćttu ađ breyta holóttum lögum um bankaeftirlit, fjárfestingar og ríkisborgararétt.

 

 

Fáfróđir og gerspilltir pólitíkusar stofnuđu ríkinu í stórhćttu vegna einkabankans hans á međan almenningur barđist gegn kúgun og niđurlćgingu og gjaldţroti ríkisins.  Gegn eigin stjórnvöldum sem unnu međ evrópskum nýlenduveldum gegn forsetanum og lýđveldinu.  Loks varđ almenningur ađ ţola andstyggilegar kosningar sem hefđu aldrei átt ađ vera haldnar í fyrstunni.  Ekki ef í landinu hefđi veriđ alvöru ríkisstjórn.

Viđ eigum líka ađ segja upp EES-samningnum.  Hann gefur Evrópuvinum lögleysuflokka eins og flokki Jóhönnu og sćnskum skúffuvinum of mikil tćkifćri til ađ ráđskast međ arđ landsins og miđanna.  Og ađ fara međ hann beint úr landi.  Samningurinn hefur stórskađađ okkur á ýmsa vegu.  Ekki síst í bankamálum eins og ICESAVE.

ICELANDIC TYCOON STILL LIVING THE HIGH LIFE IN LONDON AFTER THE COLLAPSE OF ICESAVE.

 

MIKILL STUĐNINGUR VIĐ HÓPMÁLSÓKN GEGN BJÖRGÓLFI THOR.

VILL FÁ FYRRVERANDI HLUTHAFA MEĐ Í HÓPMÁLSÓKN GEGN BJÖRGÓLFI THOR.


VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY, FYRRUM ANDÓFSMAĐUR SOVÉTRÍKJANNA.

FYRIR 5+1/2 ÁRI VARAĐI FYRRUM ANDÓFSMAĐUR OG FYRRUM FANGI OG RÍKISBORGARI GÖMLU SOVÉTRÍKJANNA (USSR) VIĐ ALGJÖRUM YFIRRÁĐUM EVRÓPUSAMBANDSINS OG SAGĐI ŢAĐ VERA SKRÍMSLI SEM YRĐI AĐ EYĐILEGGJA.  HANN ÓTTAĐIST AĐ SAMBANDIĐ VĆRI AĐ VERĐA AĐ NÝJUM SOVÉTRÍKJUM.


FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT WARNS FOR EU DICTATORSHIP 

Vladimir Bukovksy, former Soviet dissident

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Vladimir Bukovsky

Vladimir Bukovksy, the 63-year old former Soviet dissident, fears that the European Union is on its way to becoming another Soviet Union. In a speech he delivered in Brussels last week Mr Bukovsky called the EU a “monster” that must be destroyed, the sooner the better, before it develops into a fullfledged totalitarian state.

Mr Bukovsky paid a visit to the European Parliament on Thursday at the invitation of Fidesz, the Hungarian Civic Forum. Fidesz, a member of the European Christian Democrat group, had invited the former Soviet dissident over from England, where he lives, on the occasion of this year’s 50th anniversary of the 1956 Hungarian Uprising. After his morning meeting with the Hungarians, Mr Bukovsky gave an afternoon speech in a Polish restaurant in the Trier straat, opposite the European Parliament, where he spoke at the invitation of the United Kingdom Independence Party, of which he is a patron.

An interview with Vladimir Bukovsky about the impending EUSSR

In his speech Mr Bukovsky referred to confidential documents from secret Soviet files which he was allowed to read in 1992. These documents confirm the existence of a “conspiracy” to turn the European Union into a socialist organization. I attended the meeting and taped the speech. A transcript, as well as the audio fragment (approx. 15 minutes) can be found below. I also had a brief interview with Mr Bukovsky (4 minutes), a transcript and audio fragment of which can also be found below. The interview about the European Union had to be cut short because Mr Bukovsky had other engagements, but it brought back some memories to me, as I had interviewed Vladimir Bukovsky twenty years ago, in 1986, when the Soviet Union, the first monster that he so valiantly fought, was still alive and thriving.

Mr Bukovsky was one of the heroes of the 20th century. As a young man he exposed the use of psychiatric imprisonment against political prisoners in the former USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, 1917-1991) and spent a total of twelve years (1964-1976), from his 22nd to his 34th year, in Soviet jails, labour camps and psychiatric institutions. In 1976 the Soviets expelled him to the West. In 1992 he was invited by the Russian government to serve as an expert testifying at the trial conducted to determine whether the Soviet Communist Party had been a criminal institution. To prepare for his testimony Mr Bukovsky was granted access to a large number of documents from Soviet secret archives. He is one of the few people ever to have seen these documents because they are still classified. Using a small handheld scanner and a laptop computer, however, he managed to copy many documents (some with high security clearance), including KGB reports to the Soviet government.

An interview with Vladimir Bukovsky
Listen to it here

Paul Belien: You were a very famous Soviet dissident and now you are drawing a parallel between the European Union and the Soviet Union. Can you explain this?

Vladimir Bukovsky: I am referrring to structures, to certain ideologies being instilled, to the plans, the direction, the inevitable expansion, the obliteration of nations, which was the purpose of the Soviet Union. Most people do not understand this. They do not know it, but we do because we were raised in the Soviet Union where we had to study the Soviet ideology in school and at university. The ultimate purpose of the Soviet Union was to create a new historic entity, the Soviet people, all around the globe. The same is true in the EU today. They are trying to create a new people. They call this people “Europeans”, whatever that means.

According to Communist doctrine as well as to many forms of Socialist thinking, the state, the national state, is supposed to wither away. In Russia, however, the opposite happened. Instead of withering away the Soviet state became a very powerful state, but the nationalities were obliterated. But when the time of the Soviet collapse came these suppressed feelings of national identity came bouncing back and they nearly destroyed the country. It was so frightening.

PB: Do you think the same thing can happen when the European Union collapses?

VB: Absolutely, you can press a spring only that much, and the human psyche is very resilient you know. You can press it, you can press it, but don’t forget it is still accumulating a power to rebound. It is like a spring and it always goes to overshoot.

PB: But all these countries that joined the European Union did so voluntarily.

VB: No, they did not. Look at Denmark which voted against the Maastricht treaty twice. Look at Ireland [which voted against the Nice treaty]. Look at many other countries, they are under enormous pressure. It is almost blackmail. Switzerland was forced to vote five times in a referendum. All five times they have rejected it, but who knows what will happen the sixth time, the seventh time. It is always the same thing. It is a trick for idiots. The people have to vote in referendums until the people vote the way that is wanted. Then they have to stop voting. Why stop? Let us continue voting. The European Union is what Americans would call a shotgun marriage.

PB: What do you think young people should do about the European Union? What should they insist on, to democratize the institution or just abolish it?

VB: I think that the European Union, like the Soviet Union, cannot be democratized. Gorbachev tried to democratize it and it blew up. This kind of structures cannot be democratized.

PB: But we have a European Parliament which is chosen by the people.

VB: The European Parliament is elected on the basis of proportional representation, which is not true representation. And what does it vote on? The percentage of fat in yoghurt, that kind of thing. It is ridiculous. It is given the task of the Supreme Soviet. The average MP can speak for six minutes per year in the Chamber. That is not a real parliament.

Transcript of Mr Bukovsky’s Brussels speech
Listen to it here

In 1992 I had unprecedented access to Politburo and Central Committee secret documents which have been classified, and still are even now, for 30 years. These documents show very clearly that the whole idea of turning the European common market into a federal state was agreed between the left-wing parties of Europe and Moscow as a joint project which [Soviet leader Mikhail] Gorbachev in 1988-89 called our “common European home.”

The idea was very simple. It first came up in 1985-86, when the Italian Communists visited Gorbachev, followed by the German Social-Democrats. They all complained that the changes in the world, particularly after [British Prime Minister Margaret] Thatcher introduced privatisation and economic liberalisation, were threatening to wipe out the achievement (as they called it) of generations of Socialists and Social-Democrats – threatening to reverse it completely. Therefore the only way to withstand this onslaught of wild capitalism (as they called it) was to try to introduce the same socialist goals in all countries at once. Prior to that, the left-wing parties and the Soviet Union had opposed European integration very much because they perceived it as a means to block their socialist goals. From 1985 onwards they completely changed their view. The Soviets came to a conclusion and to an agreement with the left-wing parties that if they worked together they could hijack the whole European project and turn it upside down. Instead of an open market they would turn it into a federal state.

According to the [secret Soviet] documents, 1985-86 is the turning point. I have published most of these documents. You might even find them on the internet. But the conversations they had are really eye opening. For the first time you understand that there is a conspiracy – quite understandable for them, as they were trying to save their political hides. In the East the Soviets needed a change of relations with Europe because they were entering a protracted and very deep structural crisis; in the West the left-wing parties were afraid of being wiped out and losing their influence and prestige. So it was a conspiracy, quite openly made by them, agreed upon, and worked out.

In January of 1989, for example, a delegation of the Trilateral Commission came to see Gorbachev. It included [former Japanese Prime Minister Yasuhiro] Nakasone, [former French President Valéry] Giscard d’Estaing, [American banker David] Rockefeller and [former US Secretary of State Henry] Kissinger. They had a very nice conversation where they tried to explain to Gorbachev that Soviet Russia had to integrate into the financial institutions of the world, such as Gatt, the IMF and the World Bank.

In the middle of it Giscard d’Estaing suddenly takes the floor and says: “Mr President, I cannot tell you exactly when it will happen – probably within 15 years – but Europe is going to be a federal state and you have to prepare yourself for that. You have to work out with us, and the European leaders, how you would react to that, how would you allow the other Easteuropean countries to interact with it or how to become a part of it, you have to be prepared.”

This was January 1989, at a time when the [1992] Maastricht treaty had not even been drafted. How the hell did Giscard d’Estaing know what was going to happen in 15 years time? And surprise, surprise, how did he become the author of the European constitution [in 2002-03]? A very good question. It does smell of conspiracy, doesn’t it?

Luckily for us the Soviet part of this conspiracy collapsed earlier and it did not reach the point where Moscow could influence the course of events. But the original idea was to have what they called a convergency, whereby the Soviet Union would mellow somewhat and become more social-democratic, while Western Europe would become social-democratic and socialist. Then there will be convergency. The structures have to fit each other. This is why the structures of the European Union were initially built with the purpose of fitting into the Soviet structure. This is why they are so similar in functioning and in structure.

It is no accident that the European Parliament, for example, reminds me of the Supreme Soviet. It looks like the Supreme Soviet because it was designed like it. Similary, when you look at the European Commission it looks like the Politburo. I mean it does so exactly, except for the fact that the Commission now has 25 members and the Politburo usually had 13 or 15 members. Apart from that they are exactly the same, unaccountable to anyone, not directly elected by anyone at all. When you look into all this bizarre activity of the European Union with its 80,000 pages of regulations it looks like Gosplan. We used to have an organisation which was planning everything in the economy, to the last nut and bolt, five years in advance. Exactly the same thing is happening in the EU. When you look at the type of EU corruption, it is exactly the Soviet type of corruption, going from top to bottom rather than going from bottom to top.

If you go through all the structures and features of this emerging European monster you will notice that it more and more resembles the Soviet Union. Of course, it is a milder version of the Soviet Union. Please, do not misunderstand me. I am not saying that it has a Gulag. It has no KGB – not yet – but I am very carefully watching such structures as Europol for example. That really worries me a lot because this organisation will probably have powers bigger than those of the KGB. They will have diplomatic immunity. Can you imagine a KGB with diplomatic immunity? They will have to police us on 32 kinds of crimes – two of which are particularly worrying, one is called racism, another is called xenophobia. No criminal court on earth defines anything like this as a crime [this is not entirely true, as Belgium already does sopb]. So it is a new crime, and we have already been warned. Someone from the British government told us that those who object to uncontrolled immigration from the Third World will be regarded as racist and those who oppose further European integration will be regarded as xenophobes. I think Patricia Hewitt said this publicly.

Hence, we have now been warned. Meanwhile they are introducing more and more ideology. The Soviet Union used to be a state run by ideology. Today’s ideology of the European Union is social-democratic, statist, and a big part of it is also political correctness. I watch very carefully how political correctness spreads and becomes an oppressive ideology, not to mention the fact that they forbid smoking almost everywhere now. Look at this persecution of people like the Swedish pastor who was persecuted for several months because he said that the Bible does not approve homosexuality. France passed the same law of hate speech concerning gays. Britain is passing hate speech laws concerning race relations and now religious speech, and so on and so forth. What you observe, taken into perspective, is a systematic introduction of ideology which could later be enforced with oppressive measures. Apparently that is the whole purpose of Europol. Otherwise why do we need it? To me Europol looks very suspicious. I watch very carefully who is persecuted for what and what is happening, because that is one field in which I am an expert. I know how Gulags spring up.

It looks like we are living in a period of rapid, systematic and very consistent dismantlement of democracy. Look at this Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill. It makes ministers into legislators who can introduce new laws without bothering to tell Parliament or anyone. My immediate reaction is why do we need it? Britain survived two world wars, the war with Napoleon, the Spanish Armada, not to mention the Cold War, when we were told at any moment we might have a nuclear world war, without any need for introducing this kind legislation, without the need for suspending our civil liberaties and introducing emergency powers. Why do we need it right now? This can make a dictatorship out of your country in no time.

Today’s situation is really grim. Major political parties have been completely taken in by the new EU project. None of them really opposes it. They have become very corrupt. Who is going to defend our freedoms? It looks like we are heading towards some kind of collapse, some kind of crisis. The most likely outcome is that there will be an economic collapse in Europe, which in due time is bound to happen with this growth of expenses and taxes. The inability to create a competitive environment, the overregulation of the economy, the bureaucratisation, it is going to lead to economic collapse. Particularly the introduction of the euro was a crazy idea. Currency is not supposed to be political.

I have no doubt about it. There will be a collapse of the European Union pretty much like the Soviet Union collapsed. But do not forget that when these things collapse they leave such devastation that it takes a generation to recover. Just think what will happen if it comes to an economic crisis. The recrimination between nations will be huge. It might come to blows. Look to the huge number of immigrants from Third World countries now living in Europe. This was promoted by the European Union. What will happen with them if there is an economic collapse? We will probably have, like in the Soviet Union at the end, so much ethnic strife that the mind boggles. In no other country were there such ethnic tensions as in the Soviet Union, except probably in Yugoslavia. So that is exactly what will happen here, too. We have to be prepared for that. This huge edifice of bureaucracy is going to collapse on our heads.

This is why, and I am very frank about it, the sooner we finish with the EU the better. The sooner it collapses the less damage it will have done to us and to other countries. But we have to be quick because the Eurocrats are moving very fast. It will be difficult to defeat them. Today it is still simple. If one million people march on Brussels today these guys will run away to the Bahamas. If tomorrow half of the British population refuses to pay its taxes, nothing will happen and no-one will go to jail. Today you can still do that. But I do not know what the situation will be tomorrow with a fully fledged Europol staffed by former Stasi or Securitate officers. Anything may happen.

We are losing time. We have to defeat them. We have to sit and think, work out a strategy in the shortest possible way to achieve maximum effect. Otherwise it will be too late. So what should I say? My conclusion is not optimistic. So far, despite the fact that we do have some anti-EU forces in almost every country, it is not enough. We are losing and we are wasting time.

 
 
 

UNDIRLÖGĐ EVRÓPA Í NAZISTASTÍL?

Í eftirfarandi skjölum stendur ađ ólýđrćđisleg samsetning Evrópusambandsins eigi rćtur sínar í eftirstríđs-Nazisma fyrirćtlunum um undirlagđa Evrópu:

EU FACTS

The roots of the “Brussels EU”

Newly discovered documents reveal that the undemocratic structure of the “Brussels EU” has its roots in the post WWII plans of the IG Farben/Nazi-coalition in a conquered Europe.

Following are a few of the most important documents, to be used by teachers, politicians and anyone who is interested in preventing the “Brussels EU” from establishing a dictatorship of corporate interests in Europe.

CZECH PRESIDENT WARNS AGAINST EUROPEANISM.


OUT STEFAN FULE.

Stefan Fule

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Stefan Füle should not interfere with Iceland´s internal affairs in Iceland, whether publicly or otherwise.  The vast majority of Iceland voters have absolutely no intention of ever joining the EU.  This is a private issue of one political party, that of Jóhanna and Össur and their 19% of voters.  The ridiculous application into the union which was forced through the Parliament on July 16, 2009 by this same flock should never have been accepted by the EU and should be stopped no later than now.  It is not Fule´s business what we feel about the union or whether we have ´delusions or fears´ about the union, per his article on October 14th in Morgunblađiđ.  We do not need his education nor that of anyone else about the union.  Nor do we tolerate his interference.

PÓSTURINN HANS:
http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/fule/contact/commissioner/index_en.htm


99 PRÓSENTIN TAKA TIL SINNA RÁĐA.

99%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nú er fólk út um allan heim búiđ ađ missa ţolinmćđina gegn ofbeldi stjórnmálamanna gegn almenningi og yfirráđum 1 prósentsins, peningamanna heimsins yfir nánast öllu.  Og fariđ ađ mótmćla á götum úti.

Líka á Íslandi, en á Lćkjartorgi var haldinn samstöđufundur međ sömu mótmćlum og fóru fram víđa um heim samtímis.  1 prósentiđ rćđur yfir afkomu og lífi fólks í gegnum spillta stjórnmálamenn sem bankar og fjárfestar og vogunarsjóđir hafa í vasanum. 

Nú ţýđir ţađ ekki ađ allir fjársterkir menn séu hluti af eyđingaröflunum eđa ´vondir menn´, munum ţađ allavega, en nógu stór hluti veldur eyđingu og spillingu lífs eins og viđ ţekktum ţađ.  Viđ getum ekki sćtt okkur viđ ţađ og ćtlum ekki ađ sćtta okkur viđ ţađ.

Occupy movement goes global, turns violent

Occupy Wall Street Protest Brings Crowd to Times Square

Occupy Wall Street protests continue worldwide

Occupy Wall Street protests stepped up around the world‎  ‎‎

Occupy Wall Street Goes Global

'Occupy Wall St.' protest goes global

Occupy Wall Street Goes Global In Over 82 Countries

Occupy the World: The '99 Percent' Movement Goes Global

'Occupy Wall Street' Goes Global


99%Occupy Wall Street Goes Global

 

 

 

 

 

Og NEI, viđ ćtlum ekki ađ ´lenda ICESAVE´.  ICESAVE hefur veriđ lent.  Ţiđ sem viljiđ borga kúgunina geriđ ţađ og haldiđ okkur hinum utan viđ ţađ.

 


KOFI ANNAN, FORSETINN OG PALESTÍNURÍKI.

FORSETINN OG KOFI ANNAN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Kofi Atta Annan og Ólafur Ragnar Grímsson, forseti Íslands.


Kofi Annan, fyrrum leiđtogi Sameinuđu Ţjóđanna (United Nations) og friđarverđlaunahafi Nóbels, kom til landsins í dag í bođi forsetans og HÍ.  Hann gat ekki sagt nei og endurskipulagđi fyrirćtlanir sínar, sagđi hann á blađamannafundi í dag međ forsetanum á Bessastöđum. 

Hann sagđi á sama blađamannafundi ađ ´persónulega finnist honum ađ ţeim ríkjum sem eigi fast sćti í öryggisráđi Sameinuđu Ţjóđanna beri söguleg, lagaleg og siđferđisleg skylda til ađ tryggja stofnun Palestínuríkis.  Til ađ hjálpa viđ ađ fullgilda ályktun 181.  Og honum finnist ađ ţeir sem fjalli um máliđ hjá Sameinuđu Ţjóđunum ćttu ađ hafa ţađ í huga, málsađilarnir ţurfi hjálp, alţjóđasamfélagiđ og Sameinuđu Ţjóđirnar og fjórveldin verđi ađ vinna međ ţeim viđ ađ leysa máliđ og tryggja ađ sjálfstćtt ríki verđi stofnađ.´ 

Međ orđum Annan: ´And I personally believe that the UN - and particularly the permanent members of the security council, have a historic, legal and moral obligation to finish the work that was started in 1948, to implement - to help implement fully resolution 181.  And I think those who will discuss this issue at the UN should bear this in mind.  The parties need help, they have been at the table for 20 years and we´ve seen no real progress.  So we need to - the international community and the UN and the Quartet - it has to work with them to resolve this issue to ensure that the second state is established´.

Persónulega get ég ekki nema veriđ hjartanlega sammála honum og öllum öđrum sem vilja sjálfstćtt ríki Palestínu.  Og vil ađ öllu landi sem Ísrael stal af Palestínuţjóđinni međ ófyrirgefanlegu ofbeldi og yfirgangi frá 1947 verđi skilađ.  Međ valdi ef ţarf. 

Menn sem afsaka kúgun og yfirgang Ísrael gegn Palestínu frá 1947 og vísa í biblíu eru ekki viđrćđuhćfir í málinu.  Menn sem segja ađ Palestína eigi ađ vera í tvíhliđa viđrćđum viđ kúgara sinn, mćttu setja sig í spor hersetinna og nánast hlekkjađra og kúgađra manna.  Hvađ mundu ţeir sjálfir gera ef ţeir og börn ţeirra sjálfra vćru hlekkjuđ og kúguđ?  Og ţađ í eigin landi? 

Gat ekki sagt nei

Lagaleg og siđferđisleg skylda


HIN ŢÖGLU MÓTMĆLI.

silent protest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Landflótti hófst viđ fall bankanna og enn flýr fólk land af fullum ţunga ţrátt fyrir norrćnu velferđarstjórnina.  Heilbrigđisstarfsmenn og ţar međ taldir lćknar flýja í stríđum straumum og hefur talan nú SJÖ-faldast.  Og ástćđurnar eru lág laun miđađ viđ norđurlöndin og önnur vestrćn lönd, slćm vinnuađstađa, geysilegt vinnuálag. 

Í frétt í Pressunni í nóvember í fyrra:

Lćknasamtök skilja hvorki upp né niđur í ţví hvers vegna ráđamenn hlusta ekki á viđvaranir um lćknaflótta á Íslandi. Lćknaskortur er yfirvofandi.


Í frétt í Svipunni frá september í fyrra:

Svipan átti samtal viđ lćkni nýlega sem lýsti ţví ađ meira og minna allir lćknar undir 55 ára aldri séu ađ leita sér ađ starfi erlendis. Sjálfur er hann ađ velja sér starf erlendis og veit persónulega af sérfrćđingum, yfirlćknum og öđrum, međal annars lćknar á bráđamóttöku, sem eru ađeins ađ vinna uppsagnarfrestinn. Ţađ eru hreinlega allir ađ leita sér ađ starfi annarsstađar, pakka saman og fara, segir hann.
Eftir dóm hćstaréttar í lánamálum er engin önnur leiđ fyrir ţetta fólk, ţađ er ekki velkomiđ á Íslandi, hér er ekki hćgt ađ koma sér fyrir međ fjölskyldu. “Velferđarstjórnin” virđist enga grein gera sér fyrir ţví hvílík blóđtaka ţađ er ađ hirđa allar eigur af ţeirri kynslóđ sem átti ađ taka viđ framtíđ landsins. Ţessi kynslóđ fer og kemur aldrei aftur.
En er ţađ ekki einmitt ţađ sem Alţjóđagjaldeyrissjóđurinn vill?


Jú, ćtli ţađ ekki?  Engan skildi undra.  En hvađ finnst stjórnvöldum um landflóttann?  Hvađ finnst ICESAVE-STJÓRNINNI?  Svarađi ekki Steingrímur bara ađ ţađ fćddust alltaf nýir Íslendingar?  Er ţađ ţá í lagi ađ ţúsundir á ţúsundir ofan flýi föđurlandiđ bara ef ţađ fćđast enn nýir Íslendingar?  Í ţađ minnsta ekki ef fćrri koma til baka en fóru. 

Fćreyingar töpuđu stórum hluta landsmanna sinna viđ svipađa erfiđleika og fćstir komu aftur.  Grćnlendingar líka.  Oftast er ţađ unga fólkiđ sem flýr.  Ćtlum viđ ađ missa allt unga fólkiđ okkar úr landi?

Ekkert batna lífskjörin, skuldirnar rísa upp í himinhvolfiđ, enn missir fólk heimilin og vinnuna og fjölskyldur flosna upp.  Ţó nokkrir hafa framiđ sjálfsvíg í örvćntingu.  

En ţögul mótmćli fjöldans eru gríđarlega sterkt afl sem viđ getum notađ á ríkisstjórn sem skilur ekkert og vill ekkert nema evru og ICESAVE.  Og miklu öflugri en ofbeldiđ og skrílslćtin gegn saklausri lögreglu sem hafa of oft veriđ og hávađinn og öskrin.  Lćti fćla fólk í burtu frekar en hitt og ég hef veriđ ađ segja ţađ.  Stjórnvöld neyđast til ađ taka okkur alvarlega međ mćtti fjöldans. 

Svona hafa Bandaríkjamenn lengi mótmćlt á götum úti og náđ langt, enda kćmust ţeir ekkert upp međ nein skrílslćti á almannafćri og yrđi vikiđ af lögreglu.  Og mesta furđa hvađ íslenskir lögreglumenn eru vćgir, standandi ţarna í grjótregninu, enda nánast óvopnađir og mikiđ undirmannađir og illa verndađir af hálfu stjórnvalda eins og sćmir. 


ÖSSUR.

Össur

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ÖSSUR SKARPHÉĐINSSON. 

Einu sinni hafđi ég ţó nokkra trú á Össuri Skarphéđinssyni sem stjórnmálamanni.  En ţá vissi ég ekki ađ hann ćtti eftir ađ verđa einn stórfelldasti óvinur okkar í fullveldismálum.  Hann hefur fariđ langt úr veginum í blekkingum og misbeitingu valds og mílur út fyrir sitt valdsviđ viđ ađ ţröngva okkur inni í miđstýringarbákniđ ´European Union´ og gegn vilja stćrri hluta ţjóđarinnar.  Og ef viđ bćtum viđ ICESAVE kúgunarsamningnum sem hann líka ćtlađi okkur, lítur ţađ illa út fyrir Össur og hans međstjórnendur.

Hann og hans flokkur og stjórn eyđa peningum úr ríkissjóđi eins og viđ séum moldrík, ekki eins og um galtóman og skuldugan ríkiskassa sé ađ rćđa.  Mćtti halda ađ skattpeningar okkar vćru rennandi vatn.

Núna er hann samt ađ fara hárrétta leiđ í samskiptum viđ Palestínu.  Viđ getum ekki horft ţegjandi upp á kúgun og ofbeldi Ísrael gegn Palestínu.  Ísrael ćtti ađ draga fyrir alţjóđadómstól fyrir glćpi gegn mannkyni og fyrst og síđast ţvinga hrottaher Ísrael burt úr löglegu landi og lögsögu Palestínu.  Loks verđur ađ taka stoliđ landiđ af ţeim međ góđu eđa illu.


http://www.ruv.is/frett/palestinumenn-myndi-thjodstjorn

http://www.ruv.is/frett/island-og-palestina-gera-samkomulag

E.S.: Og bćti ţessu viđ: http://www.ruv.is/flokkar/innlendar-frettir

 


Ó, ŢÚ DÝRĐLEGA EVRÓPUVELDI.

Nigel Farage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Er Evrópusambandiđ skrímsli á jörđu?  Fyrrum andófsmađur gömlu Sovétríkjanna (USSR), Vladimir Bukovksy, óttast ađ Evrópusambandiđ sé ađ verđa ađ nýjum Sovétríkjum.  Hann hefur varađ viđ algjöru einrćđi sambandsins og segir ţađ vera skrímsli sem verđi ađ eyđileggja: http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/865

Nokkrar upptökur beint úr sjálfu skrímslinu sem Nigel Farage (MEP: Member of the European Parliament) lýsir sem forrćđissviptandi og lýđrćđissviptandi og ólýđrćđislegu bákni sem ráđi yfir og stjórni 500 milljón manns:


CREEPING EU TOTALITARIANISM.

END OF NATIONS - EU TAKEOVER.

ICELANDERS DO NOT WANT TO JOIN THE EU.

THE LAST DAYS OF DEMOCRACY?  THE E-FILES. 

WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?

 


Nćsta síđa »

Innskráning

Ath. Vinsamlegast kveikiđ á Javascript til ađ hefja innskráningu.

Hafđu samband