Fćrsluflokkur: Evrópumál

ICELAND, DON'T DO IT!

Nigel Farage1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nigel Farage


ICELAND
, DON'T DO IT! - NIGEL FARAGE MEP


LESEFNI FYRIR JÓHÖNNU OG ÖSSUR.

bukovsky 1Vladimir Bukovksy, former Soviet dissident

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Vladimir Konstantinovich Bukovsky

 

FYRIR 5+1/2 ÁRI VARAĐI VLADIMIR KONSTANTINOVICH BUKOVSKY FYRRUM ANDÓFSMAĐUR OG FYRRUM FANGI OG RÍKISBORGARI GÖMLU SOVÉTRÍKJANNA (USSR) VIĐ ALGJÖRUM YFIRRÁĐUM EVRÓPUSAMBANDSINS OG SAGĐI ŢAĐ VERA SKRÍMSLI SEM YRĐI AĐ EYĐILEGGJA SEM FYRST.  HANN ÓTTAĐIST AĐ SAMBANDIĐ VĆRI AĐ VERĐA AĐ NÝJUM SOVÉTRÍKJUM.  RĆĐAN HANS Á ENN FULLT ERINDI.

Vladimir Bukovksy, the 63-year old former Soviet dissident, fears that the European Union is on its way to becoming another Soviet Union. In a speech he delivered in Brussels last week Mr Bukovsky called the EU a “monster” that must be destroyed, the sooner the better, before it develops into a fullfledged totalitarian state.

HLUTI ÚR RĆĐU HANS:  

It looks like we are living in a period of rapid, systematic and very consistent dismantlement of democracy. Look at this Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill. It makes ministers into legislators who can introduce new laws without bothering to tell Parliament or anyone. My immediate reaction is why do we need it? Britain survived two world wars, the war with Napoleon, the Spanish Armada, not to mention the Cold War, when we were told at any moment we might have a nuclear world war, without any need for introducing this kind legislation, without the need for suspending our civil liberaties and introducing emergency powers. Why do we need it right now? This can make a dictatorship out of your country in no time.

Today’s situation is really grim. Major political parties have been completely taken in by the new EU project. None of them really opposes it. They have become very corrupt. Who is going to defend our freedoms? It looks like we are heading towards some kind of collapse, some kind of crisis. The most likely outcome is that there will be an economic collapse in Europe, which in due time is bound to happen with this growth of expenses and taxes. The inability to create a competitive environment, the overregulation of the economy, the bureaucratisation, it is going to lead to economic collapse. Particularly the introduction of the euro was a crazy idea. Currency is not supposed to be political.

I have no doubt about it. There will be a collapse of the European Union pretty much like the Soviet Union collapsed. But do not forget that when these things collapse they leave such devastation that it takes a generation to recover. Just think what will happen if it comes to an economic crisis. The recrimination between nations will be huge. It might come to blows. Look to the huge number of immigrants from Third World countries now living in Europe. This was promoted by the European Union. What will happen with them if there is an economic collapse? We will probably have, like in the Soviet Union at the end, so much ethnic strife that the mind boggles. In no other country were there such ethnic tensions as in the Soviet Union, except probably in Yugoslavia. So that is exactly what will happen here, too. We have to be prepared for that. This huge edifice of bureaucracy is going to collapse on our heads.

This is why, and I am very frank about it, the sooner we finish with the EU the better. The sooner it collapses the less damage it will have done to us and to other countries. But we have to be quick because the Eurocrats are moving very fast. It will be difficult to defeat them. Today it is still simple. If one million people march on Brussels today these guys will run away to the Bahamas. If tomorrow half of the British population refuses to pay its taxes, nothing will happen and no-one will go to jail. Today you can still do that. But I do not know what the situation will be tomorrow with a fully fledged Europol staffed by former Stasi or Securitate officers. Anything may happen.

We are losing time. We have to defeat them. We have to sit and think, work out a strategy in the shortest possible way to achieve maximum effect. Otherwise it will be too late. So what should I say? My conclusion is not optimistic. So far, despite the fact that we do have some anti-EU forces in almost every country, it is not enough. We are losing and we are wasting time.

HANN VARAĐI OKKUR VIĐ SKAĐRĆĐIS-STJÓRNMÁLAMÖNNUM EINS OG JÓHÖNNU, ÖSSURI OG CO.  STEINGRÍMUR GETUR SAGT ŢEIM HVAĐ ŢETTA ŢÝĐIR.  HANN ĆTTI AĐ VITA.

Ó, ŢÚ DÝRĐLEGA EVRÓPUVELDI.

Nigel Farage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Er Evrópusambandiđ skrímsli á jörđu?  Fyrrum andófsmađur gömlu Sovétríkjanna (USSR), Vladimir Bukovksy, óttast ađ Evrópusambandiđ sé ađ verđa ađ nýjum Sovétríkjum.  Hann hefur varađ viđ algjöru einrćđi sambandsins og segir ţađ vera skrímsli sem verđi ađ eyđileggja: http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/865

Nokkrar upptökur beint úr sjálfu skrímslinu sem Nigel Farage (MEP: Member of the European Parliament) lýsir sem forrćđissviptandi og lýđrćđissviptandi og ólýđrćđislegu bákni sem ráđi yfir og stjórni 500 milljón manns:


CREEPING EU TOTALITARIANISM.

END OF NATIONS - EU TAKEOVER.

ICELANDERS DO NOT WANT TO JOIN THE EU.

THE LAST DAYS OF DEMOCRACY?  THE E-FILES. 

WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE?

 


FORSETINN OKKAR STERKASTI LEIĐTOGI.

Forsetinn, Ólafur Ragnar Grímsson, er okkar langhćfasti leiđtogi ađ mínum dómi.  Hann hefur nánast einn leiđtoga skýrt mál okkar og stöđu vegna ICESAVE erlendis.  Og ötullega.  Mest af öllu kom forsetinn í veg fyrir ólýsanlega niđurlćgingu íslensks almennings ţegar hann skrifađi ekki undir kúgunarsamninginn. 

Hinn almenni mađur hefur líka orđiđ ađ verjast í erlendum fjölmiđlum ţar sem ekki gerđi ríkisstjórnin ţađ.  Ríkisstjórnin hefur aldrei komiđ fram opinberlega og lýst yfir ađ krafa Breta, Hollendinga og Evrópusambandsins um ríkisábyrgđ á ICESAVE standist engin lög.  Og enn síđur stađiđ í lappirnar gegn kröfunni.  Og ţađ er forkastanlegt.  Ögmundur gerđi ţađ ađ vísu en viđ misstum hann ađ lokum ofan í svartholiđ. 

Jóhanna hefur frá upphafi málsins heimtađ ríkisábyrgđ.  Óhćfu Jóhönnu hefur veriđ haldiđ fast uppi af hverjum einasta manni í hennar flokki og ríkisstjórninni sem heild, ICESAVE-STJÓRNINNI.   Ítrekađ skal Jóhanna fara fram opinberlega og eyđileggja málstađ okkar lofandi öllum heiminum ađ viđ ćtlum ađ borga ´SKULDIR OKKAR´ eins og ţađ komi ríkisábyrgđ á ICESAVE viđ.

Óskiljanlega Evrópuríkislöngunin hefur veriđ mesti skađvaldurinn.  Vilji og ćtlun flokksins og fylgjenda var ađ fallast á allar grimmilegu og ólöglegu kröfur evrópsku ríkjanna nánast óséđar og styggja ţau ekki.  Gćti skemmt fyrir ´ţiđ vitiđ´.  Og stefna ríkiseigum í stórhćttu.  Ţann veikleika hafa rukkararnir oft notađ, dćmin eru endalaus.  Og gera enn í dag eins og ekkert vćri:
Holland hindri ESB-ađild og samvinnu viđ AGS

Hver skuldar hverjum hvađ? Er kristilegt ađ seilast eftir fé okkar?

Óttast fordćmi Íslands

Forysta VG og mest allur flokkurinn hlýddu eins og mýs ţó nokkrir ţeirra hafi hafnađ kúgunarsamningnum.  Víst vildi Steingrímur alls, alls, ALLS ekki ađ Sjálfstćđisflokkurinn kćmist aftur ađ völdum og ćtlađi ađ hanga og hanga límdur viđ sćtiđ ţó hann sökkti landinu í sć fyrir.

 

Í BBC:

UK 'will get Iceland money back'


 Iceland's President Olafur Ragnar Grimsson
Mr Grimsson had refused to sign the latest repayment plan, triggering the referendum.

Iceland's President Olafur Ragnar Grimsson has said that the UK and the Netherlands will get back the 4bn euros (Ł3.5bn) they paid when Iceland's banking system collapsed in 2008.

That is despite the country rejecting the latest repayment plan in a referendum at the weekend.

Mr Grimsson told the BBC assets from the collapsed bank Landsbanki would "in all likelihood" cover what was owed.

The UK has said the matter will go to an international court.

Iceland's three main banks collapsed in October 2008.

Landsbanki ran savings accounts in the UK and the Netherlands under the name Icesave.

When it collapsed, the British and Dutch governments had to reimburse 400,000 citizens - and Iceland had to decide how to repay that money.

Guarantee question.
 
The weekend result marked the second time a referendum has rejected a repayment deal.

Mr Grimsson said that it was not an issue about paying or not paying, but a question of whether there is a state guarantee and how that would be interpreted under the European regulatory framework.

"I think the primary message [from the referendum] is that before ordinary people are asked to pay for failed banks, the assets inside the estate of these banks should be used to pay the subs," Mr Grimsson told Radio 4's Today.

"That is why the people of Iceland emphasised that Britain and the Netherlands are going to get certainly up to $9bn out of the estate of Landsbanki.

"The first payment will be this December, and in all likelihood this will cover what was paid by Britain and the Netherlands two years ago.

"But to ask for a state guarantee and that ordinary people should shoulder the responsibility is highly doubtful and definitely can be disputed within the European legislative framework."

But he added that if the matter did end up in an international court, "of course" Iceland would abide by the court's ruling.

UK ´will get Iceland money back´

 

mbl.is
Loksins, loksins

HĆTTIĐ AĐ RAKKA NIĐUR FORSETANN.

FORSETINN 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nú koma ICESAVE stuđningsmenn hver á fćtur öđrum upp úr holunum og rakka niđur forsetann fyrir ađ vinna vinnuna sína og verja lýđrćđiđ í landinu.  Og verja ţjóđina gegn fordćmalausri kúgun og löglausri kröfu bresku og hollensku ríkisstjórnanna,  Evrópusambandsins og íslensku ríkisstjórnarinnar, ICESAVE-STJÓRNARINNAR og annarra norrćnna ríkisstjórna sem eru sorglega illa upplýstar í málinu. 

Líka menn sem sjálfir hafa löngu glatađ öllu trausti landsmanna eins og Björn Valur Gíslason og Jóhanna Sigurđardóttir.  Eins og ţau tvö hafi nú efni á ađ gagnrýna nokkurn mann, hvađ ţá rakka niđur forsetann sem nánast einn Íslendinga hefur variđ okkur á erlendri grundu.  Nú hefur sćnskur dálkahöfundur bćttst í hópinn og rakkar niđur forsetann í sćnsku blađi og ţađ er bćđi óţolandi og sorglegt. 

ICESAVE-STJÓRNIN og stjórnarflokkarnir hafa skađađ okkur stórkostlega erlendis og ekkert variđ okkur, nema Ögmundur.  Og hann glatađist okkur samt í lokin.  Ýmsir landsmenn og líka heimurinn er alltof illa upplýstur um máliđ og lćtur eins og viđ séum ađ rćna Breta og Hollendinga ţegar ţađ sanna er ađ viđ, íslenskir skattţegar og íslenska ríkiđ, skuldum ţeim ekki neitt.  Enginn dómur hefur falliđ ţar um. 

Ţar fyrir utan fá Bretar og Hollendingar gífurlegar fjárhćđir úr ţrotabúi Landsbankans, 7-9 MILLJARĐA Bandaríkjadala örugga eđa yfir ţađ og 700-900 MILLJARĐA ísl. króna minnst eđa yfir 1000 MILLJARĐA.  Og ICESAVE-STJÓRNIN og stjórnarflokkarnir segja ekki orđ um ţađ.  Nei, steinţegja ţađ í hel eins og allar lagalegar varnir okkar sem viđ nú ţegar höfum í málinu og höfum alltaf haft.  

FORSETINN Á BLAĐAMANNAFUNDINUM Á BESSASTÖĐUM Í GĆR:


RISAVAXNAR UPPHĆĐIR.

ĆTLAR AĐ TALA MÁLI ÍSLANDS.

FORSETINN Í SÍMA VIĐ BLOOMBERG:

ÖMURLEG FRAMMISTAĐA MOODY´S.


EVRÓPURÍKIĐ MUN HAFA ĆĐSTA VALD.

HVAĐ ER MÁLIĐ MEĐ UNDANŢÁGUR?
HVER MUN FARA MEĐ ĆĐSTA VALD?

european union cartoons, european union cartoon, european union picture, european union pictures, european union image, european union images, european union illustration, european union illustrations

Alltaf finnst mér jafn-merkilegt ţegar Evrópuríkis-inngöngusinnar stagast út í hiđ óendanlega á undanţágunum sem viđ munum fá viđ inngöngu í Evrópuríkiđ.  Eđa yfirtöku öllu heldur.  Hvađa máli geta undanţágur skipt fyrir okkur?  Ekki nokkrum sköpuđum hlut.  Hvađ ćtlum viđ ađ gera ţarna inn ef viđ ţurfum undanţágur fyrir ađ fá af ţeirra náđ ađ vera enn sjálfstćtt ríki??  Og fyrir utan ţađ er vitađ ađ engar varanlegar undanţágur fáist ţarna.   Halda menn sig kannski ţá fyrst verđa menn međ mönnum??  Ćtlum viđ ađ gangast undir erlent ríki og miđstýringarveldi fyrir nokkrar ýsur sem eru okkar??

Engu máli skiptir heldur fyrir afkomendur okkar nćstu aldirnar hvađ stendur í lögunum akkúrat núna, hvort lögin ţar eru elskuleg, fáránleg eđa vond.  Og enn síđur skipta undanţágur sem endast
ekki, nokkru einasta máli.  Og ţó okkur vćri sagt ađ viđ fengjum óendanlegar og ćvarandi undanţágur, vćri ţađ galtómt og rakalaust ţvađur.  Lykilatriđiđ liggur í ađ lögum getur veriđ breytt og eytt og ný lög sett ađ vild stjórnvalda ţar, ekki okkar.  Viđ munum ekki hafa neitt vćgi.  Ţeir munu jú fara međ ćđsta vald, ef viđ verđum svo vitlaus ađ fara ţangađ inn og ţar međ gefa stórríkinu eftir fullveldi okkar. 

Does European law override national law?
Yes it does.

Is this stated in the Constitution?   Yes.
Is this anything new?   No.


The principle of European law overriding national law has actually been around since 1963, when it was decided that European law could not be applied in different ways in the Member States, without fundamentally undermining any chance of acheiving the Treaty objectives.

Treaty objectives are agreed by the member governments when a new Treaty is being drafted. The EU can only propose new laws to fulfill the completion of those Treaty objectives, and should not come out with measures outside of that framework.


http://www.europeanlawmonitor.org/EU-Information/EU-Legal-Principles/
EU-Law-Does-European-Law-Override-National-Law.html


Geta Jóhanna og Össur og co. ekki bara pakkađ ofan í töskur og flutt?  Og leyft okkur hinum ađ vera í friđi??


Innskráning

Ath. Vinsamlegast kveikiđ á Javascript til ađ hefja innskráningu.

Hafđu samband