BANDARÍKIN ERU LANGT Í FRÁ MEÐ HÆSTU MORÐTÍÐNI HEIMS.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America (Canada, Mexico, United States)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Latin Americas (Central and South America)

Nei það er af og frá að Bandaríkin séu með hæstu morðtíðni heims, ekki miðað við fólksfjölda.  Og þó talað væri bara um álfuna Ameríku en ekki heiminn.  Hondúras væri langverst í álfunni og þarnæst Venesúela.  Líka þó talað væri bara um norðurhluta álfunnar Ameríku en ekki heiminn.  Grænland og Mexikó væru þar langverst, miðað við fólksfjölda.  Hvert einasta land í allri álfunni Ameríku er með hærri morðtíðni en Bandaríkin, nema 2, Kanada og Síle.  Og oftast eru Ameríkulöndin með miklu miklu hærri morðtíðni en Bandaríki Norður-Ameríku. 

 

Og ég er orðin leið á að heyra villusögur um Bandaríkin.  Leið á að hlusta á Íslendinga tala eins og maður geti ekki gengið um göturnar þar nema vera skotinn niður.  Og ég er ósátt við það þar sem ofbeldi í Bandaríkjunum er lítið miðað við fjölda landa heims og Bandaríkjamenn eru í heild friðsamir.  Friðsamasta fólk sem ég þekki.  Við heyrum bara mest um Bandaríkin þar sem fréttir eru galopnar þar eins og mannréttindalandi sæmir.  

 

Í Bandaríkjunum gekk ég um göturnar í 22 ár og var aldrei skotin niður að ég viti.  Það var aldrei ráðist á mig á almannafæri eða á götum úti.  Og ég var ekki hrædd að labba þar eins og maður nokkur spurði mig þegar ég kom til Íslands 1997 í skamma stund.  Ekki vanalega.  Það var sami maður og var með barn sitt sem skiptinema í öðru Ameríkulandi 1992, suður af Bandaríkjum Norður Ameríku, en þar í landi ætti maður að óttast að vera skotinn niður.

 

Frá mínum bæjardyrum séð, lítur út fyrir að mikil fáfræði sé um Bandaríkin þegar fólk aftur og aftur talar eins og það sé morðland heimsins og tekur undir vitleysuna hvert með öðru eins og út í loftið.  Eða bara af því það haldi það, kannski miðað við það sem það heyrði næsta mann segja, líka út í loftið.  Múgsefjun mætti kalla það.  En ég elska þetta land og vil ekki hlusta þegjandi.  Það er ekki nóg að halda það sem maður veit ekki.

 

 

 

Mætti oft halda að fólk ruglaði saman álfunni Ameríku og Bandaríkjunum.  Það eru mikil mistök Bandaríkjamanna að nota oft orðið Ameríka þegar þeir tala um landið Bandaríkin og það veldur kannski misskilningi meðal þeirra sem vita ekkert eða lítið um landið.

 

 

 

Miða ætti við fólksfjöldann (per capita) í löndum þegar talað er um morðtíðni landa.  Og rangt að nota bara tíðni glæps ef eitt land er þúsund sinnum eða milljón sinnum fjölmennara en annað land í viðmiðuninni.  Morðtíðni heimsins per capita er að meðaltali langverst í Mið- og Suður-Ameríku (álfunni Ameríku, ekki Bandaríkjum Norður-Ameríku) og Mið- og Suður-Afríku.  Það er miklu miklu hærri glæpatíðni og morðtíðni per capita í fjölda þessara landa en í Bandaríkjunum.  Ef við miðum bara við álfuna Ameríku er morðtíðni per capita óhugnanleg í Belís, Brasilíu, El Salvador, Guatemala, Grænlandi (kemur ekki fram undir Ameríku í töflunni sem vísað er í), Hondúras, Kólumbíu, Mexikó, og Venesúela. 

 

 

 

Mexikó er við suðurlandamæri Bandaríkjanna og þar er miklu hærri morðtíðni per capita en í Bandaríkjunum.  Stórtækasti barnamorðingi og raðmorðingi heims sem vitað er um var Luis Garavito í Kólumbíu.  Í heimildarmynd (documentary) var hann kallaður versti raðmorðingi heims.  Hann drap í minnsta lagi 140 unga drengi eftir að hafa níðst á þeim og pínt þá, en er samt nánast óþekktur, enda ekki frá vonda USA.

   

 

Frá Mexikó streymir fólk ólöglega norður yfir landamærin til Bandaríkjanna og er erfitt að stoppa það.  Í september í fyrra voru um 11,7 milljón ólöglegir innflytjendur í Bandaríkjunum og mest eða um 57% þeirra frá glæpalandinu Mexikó.  Stór hluti hinna er frá Mið-Ameríkuríkjum.

 

 

Neðanverð tafla er frá Sameinuðu Þjóðunum.  Þetta er álfan Ameríka og taflan sýnir bæði heildarmorð í löndunum og morð á hver 100 þúsund manns (count total and rate per 100,000 population).

                                        RATE    TOTAL

Belize	44.7	145	Americas	Central America	2012
Costa Rica	8.5	407	Americas	Central America	2012
El Salvador	41.2	2,594	Americas	Central America	2012
Guatemala	39.9	6,025	Americas	Central America	2012
Honduras	90.4	7,172	Americas	Central America	2012
Mexico	21.5	26,037+	Americas	Central America	2012
Nicaragua	11.3	675	Americas	Central America	2012
Panama	17.2	654	Americas	Central America	2012
Bermuda (UK)	7.7	5	Americas	Northern America	2012
Canada	1.6	543	Americas	Northern America	2012
Saint Pierre and Miquelon (France)	16.5	1	Americas	Northern America	2009
United States	4.8[8]	14,173	Americas	Northern America	2012
Argentina	5.5	2,237	Americas	South America	2010
Bolivia	12.1	1,270	Americas	South America	2012
Brazil	25.2	50,108	Americas	South America	2012
Chile	3.1	550	Americas	South America	2012
Colombia	30.8	14,670+	Americas	South America	2012
Ecuador	12.4	1,924	Americas	South America	2012
French Guiana (France)	13.3	30	Americas	South America	2009
Guyana	17.0	135	Americas	South America	2012
Paraguay	9.7	649	Americas	South America	2012
Peru	9.6	2,865	Americas	South America	2012
Suriname	6.1	33	Americas	South America	2012
Uruguay	7.9	267	Americas	South America	2012
Venezuela	53.7	16,072+[9]	Americas	South America	2012

 

Fólk mætti svo skoða töfluna fyrir allan heiminn nánar áður en það fer að lýsa Bandaríkin sem versta morðlandi heims.  List of countries by intentional homicide rate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The US Flag

 

                                                      

ICELAND, DON'T DO IT!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nigel Farage

ICELAND, DON'T DO IT! - NIGEL FARAGE MEP

LESEFNI FYRIR JÓHÖNNU OG ÖSSUR.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vladimir Konstantinovich Bukovsky

 

FYRIR 5+1/2 ÁRI VARAÐI VLADIMIR KONSTANTINOVICH BUKOVSKY FYRRUM ANDÓFSMAÐUR OG FYRRUM FANGI OG RÍKISBORGARI GÖMLU SOVÉTRÍKJANNA (USSR) VIÐ ALGJÖRUM YFIRRÁÐUM EVRÓPUSAMBANDSINS OG SAGÐI ÞAÐ VERA SKRÍMSLI SEM YRÐI AÐ EYÐILEGGJA SEM FYRST.  HANN ÓTTAÐIST AÐ SAMBANDIÐ VÆRI AÐ VERÐA AÐ NÝJUM SOVÉTRÍKJUM.  RÆÐAN HANS Á ENN FULLT ERINDI.

Vladimir Bukovksy, the 63-year old former Soviet dissident, fears that the European Union is on its way to becoming another Soviet Union. In a speech he delivered in Brussels last week Mr Bukovsky called the EU a “monster” that must be destroyed, the sooner the better, before it develops into a fullfledged totalitarian state.

HLUTI ÚR RÆÐU HANS:  

It looks like we are living in a period of rapid, systematic and very consistent dismantlement of democracy. Look at this Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill. It makes ministers into legislators who can introduce new laws without bothering to tell Parliament or anyone. My immediate reaction is why do we need it? Britain survived two world wars, the war with Napoleon, the Spanish Armada, not to mention the Cold War, when we were told at any moment we might have a nuclear world war, without any need for introducing this kind legislation, without the need for suspending our civil liberaties and introducing emergency powers. Why do we need it right now? This can make a dictatorship out of your country in no time.

Today’s situation is really grim. Major political parties have been completely taken in by the new EU project. None of them really opposes it. They have become very corrupt. Who is going to defend our freedoms? It looks like we are heading towards some kind of collapse, some kind of crisis. The most likely outcome is that there will be an economic collapse in Europe, which in due time is bound to happen with this growth of expenses and taxes. The inability to create a competitive environment, the overregulation of the economy, the bureaucratisation, it is going to lead to economic collapse. Particularly the introduction of the euro was a crazy idea. Currency is not supposed to be political.

I have no doubt about it. There will be a collapse of the European Union pretty much like the Soviet Union collapsed. But do not forget that when these things collapse they leave such devastation that it takes a generation to recover. Just think what will happen if it comes to an economic crisis. The recrimination between nations will be huge. It might come to blows. Look to the huge number of immigrants from Third World countries now living in Europe. This was promoted by the European Union. What will happen with them if there is an economic collapse? We will probably have, like in the Soviet Union at the end, so much ethnic strife that the mind boggles. In no other country were there such ethnic tensions as in the Soviet Union, except probably in Yugoslavia. So that is exactly what will happen here, too. We have to be prepared for that. This huge edifice of bureaucracy is going to collapse on our heads.

This is why, and I am very frank about it, the sooner we finish with the EU the better. The sooner it collapses the less damage it will have done to us and to other countries. But we have to be quick because the Eurocrats are moving very fast. It will be difficult to defeat them. Today it is still simple. If one million people march on Brussels today these guys will run away to the Bahamas. If tomorrow half of the British population refuses to pay its taxes, nothing will happen and no-one will go to jail. Today you can still do that. But I do not know what the situation will be tomorrow with a fully fledged Europol staffed by former Stasi or Securitate officers. Anything may happen.

We are losing time. We have to defeat them. We have to sit and think, work out a strategy in the shortest possible way to achieve maximum effect. Otherwise it will be too late. So what should I say? My conclusion is not optimistic. So far, despite the fact that we do have some anti-EU forces in almost every country, it is not enough. We are losing and we are wasting time.

HANN VARAÐI OKKUR VIÐ SKAÐRÆÐIS-STJÓRNMÁLAMÖNNUM EINS OG JÓHÖNNU, ÖSSURI OG CO.  STEINGRÍMUR GETUR SAGT ÞEIM HVAÐ ÞETTA ÞÝÐIR.  HANN ÆTTI AÐ VITA.

HVÍ FÆR BJÖRGÓLFUR THOR AÐ VAÐA UM LANDIÐ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MOUSE OR RAT? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hví ættu menn eins og Björgólfur Thor, búandi í öðru landi í langan tíma að fá að reka banka, gagnaver og lyfjafyrirtæki, etc, í landinu?  Og þó þeir hafi ekki formlega gefið upp ríkisborgararéttinn?  Ættu ekki að vera lagaleg mörk fyrir fjárfestingaleyfi brottfluttra manna í landinu?

Maðurinn býr í Bretlandi, nánar tiltekið í London, Englandi.  Og borgar skatta þar.  Fyrir 3 árum var hann 29. ríkasti maður Bretlands.  Samt notfærir hann sér að hann er enn tæknilega ríkisborgari Íslands.  Og kemst upp með það.

Hann fær að valsa um eins og hann eigi landið.  Og okra með háu lyfjaverði á gamalmennum og sjúklingum.  Hann fær að vaða um í bönkum og grafa undan stoðunum.

 

Hann, langstærsti eigandi ICESAVE hrollvekjubankans, býr í kúgunarlandi okkar í ICESAVE-málinu.  Já, af öllum löndum.  Hví fær hann annars að búa þar verandi íslenskur ríkisborgari??  Vegna EES-samningsins?

Svipað verður sagt um nokkra aðra refi sem óðu um allt á skítugum skóm og tæmdu banka að innan á kostnað landsmanna.  Ýmist beint eða óbeint í gegnum ehf flækjur og millifærslur.  Stjórnmálamenn sem vit hafa ættu að breyta holóttum lögum um bankaeftirlit, fjárfestingar og ríkisborgararétt.

 

 

Fáfróðir og gerspilltir pólitíkusar stofnuðu ríkinu í stórhættu vegna einkabankans hans á meðan almenningur barðist gegn kúgun og niðurlægingu og gjaldþroti ríkisins.  Gegn eigin stjórnvöldum sem unnu með evrópskum nýlenduveldum gegn forsetanum og lýðveldinu.  Loks varð almenningur að þola andstyggilegar kosningar sem hefðu aldrei átt að vera haldnar í fyrstunni.  Ekki ef í landinu hefði verið alvöru ríkisstjórn.

Við eigum líka að segja upp EES-samningnum.  Hann gefur Evrópuvinum lögleysuflokka eins og flokki Jóhönnu og sænskum skúffuvinum of mikil tækifæri til að ráðskast með arð landsins og miðanna.  Og að fara með hann beint úr landi.  Samningurinn hefur stórskaðað okkur á ýmsa vegu.  Ekki síst í bankamálum eins og ICESAVE.

ICELANDIC TYCOON STILL LIVING THE HIGH LIFE IN LONDON AFTER THE COLLAPSE OF ICESAVE.

 

MIKILL STUÐNINGUR VIÐ HÓPMÁLSÓKN GEGN BJÖRGÓLFI THOR.

VILL FÁ FYRRVERANDI HLUTHAFA MEÐ Í HÓPMÁLSÓKN GEGN BJÖRGÓLFI THOR.

VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY, FYRRUM ANDÓFSMAÐUR SOVÉTRÍKJANNA.

FYRIR 5+1/2 ÁRI VARAÐI FYRRUM ANDÓFSMAÐUR OG FYRRUM FANGI OG RÍKISBORGARI GÖMLU SOVÉTRÍKJANNA (USSR) VIÐ ALGJÖRUM YFIRRÁÐUM EVRÓPUSAMBANDSINS OG SAGÐI ÞAÐ VERA SKRÍMSLI SEM YRÐI AÐ EYÐILEGGJA.  HANN ÓTTAÐIST AÐ SAMBANDIÐ VÆRI AÐ VERÐA AÐ NÝJUM SOVÉTRÍKJUM.

FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT WARNS FOR EU DICTATORSHIP 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vladimir Bukovsky

Mon, 2006-02-27 21:13

Vladimir Bukovksy, the 63-year old former Soviet dissident, fears that the European Union is on its way to becoming another Soviet Union. In a speech he delivered in Brussels last week Mr Bukovsky called the EU a “monster” that must be destroyed, the sooner the better, before it develops into a fullfledged totalitarian state.

Mr Bukovsky paid a visit to the European Parliament on Thursday at the invitation of Fidesz, the Hungarian Civic Forum. Fidesz, a member of the European Christian Democrat group, had invited the former Soviet dissident over from England, where he lives, on the occasion of this year’s 50th anniversary of the 1956 Hungarian Uprising. After his morning meeting with the Hungarians, Mr Bukovsky gave an afternoon speech in a Polish restaurant in the Trier straat, opposite the European Parliament, where he spoke at the invitation of the United Kingdom Independence Party, of which he is a patron.

An interview with Vladimir Bukovsky about the impending EUSSR

In his speech Mr Bukovsky referred to confidential documents from secret Soviet files which he was allowed to read in 1992. These documents confirm the existence of a “conspiracy” to turn the European Union into a socialist organization. I attended the meeting and taped the speech. A transcript, as well as the audio fragment (approx. 15 minutes) can be found below. I also had a brief interview with Mr Bukovsky (4 minutes), a transcript and audio fragment of which can also be found below. The interview about the European Union had to be cut short because Mr Bukovsky had other engagements, but it brought back some memories to me, as I had interviewed Vladimir Bukovsky twenty years ago, in 1986, when the Soviet Union, the first monster that he so valiantly fought, was still alive and thriving.

Mr Bukovsky was one of the heroes of the 20th century. As a young man he exposed the use of psychiatric imprisonment against political prisoners in the former USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, 1917-1991) and spent a total of twelve years (1964-1976), from his 22nd to his 34th year, in Soviet jails, labour camps and psychiatric institutions. In 1976 the Soviets expelled him to the West. In 1992 he was invited by the Russian government to serve as an expert testifying at the trial conducted to determine whether the Soviet Communist Party had been a criminal institution. To prepare for his testimony Mr Bukovsky was granted access to a large number of documents from Soviet secret archives. He is one of the few people ever to have seen these documents because they are still classified. Using a small handheld scanner and a laptop computer, however, he managed to copy many documents (some with high security clearance), including KGB reports to the Soviet government.

An interview with Vladimir Bukovsky
Listen to it here

Paul Belien: You were a very famous Soviet dissident and now you are drawing a parallel between the European Union and the Soviet Union. Can you explain this?

Vladimir Bukovsky: I am referrring to structures, to certain ideologies being instilled, to the plans, the direction, the inevitable expansion, the obliteration of nations, which was the purpose of the Soviet Union. Most people do not understand this. They do not know it, but we do because we were raised in the Soviet Union where we had to study the Soviet ideology in school and at university. The ultimate purpose of the Soviet Union was to create a new historic entity, the Soviet people, all around the globe. The same is true in the EU today. They are trying to create a new people. They call this people “Europeans”, whatever that means.

According to Communist doctrine as well as to many forms of Socialist thinking, the state, the national state, is supposed to wither away. In Russia, however, the opposite happened. Instead of withering away the Soviet state became a very powerful state, but the nationalities were obliterated. But when the time of the Soviet collapse came these suppressed feelings of national identity came bouncing back and they nearly destroyed the country. It was so frightening.

PB: Do you think the same thing can happen when the European Union collapses?

VB: Absolutely, you can press a spring only that much, and the human psyche is very resilient you know. You can press it, you can press it, but don’t forget it is still accumulating a power to rebound. It is like a spring and it always goes to overshoot.

PB: But all these countries that joined the European Union did so voluntarily.

VB: No, they did not. Look at Denmark which voted against the Maastricht treaty twice. Look at Ireland [which voted against the Nice treaty]. Look at many other countries, they are under enormous pressure. It is almost blackmail. Switzerland was forced to vote five times in a referendum. All five times they have rejected it, but who knows what will happen the sixth time, the seventh time. It is always the same thing. It is a trick for idiots. The people have to vote in referendums until the people vote the way that is wanted. Then they have to stop voting. Why stop? Let us continue voting. The European Union is what Americans would call a shotgun marriage.

PB: What do you think young people should do about the European Union? What should they insist on, to democratize the institution or just abolish it?

VB: I think that the European Union, like the Soviet Union, cannot be democratized. Gorbachev tried to democratize it and it blew up. This kind of structures cannot be democratized.

PB: But we have a European Parliament which is chosen by the people.

VB: The European Parliament is elected on the basis of proportional representation, which is not true representation. And what does it vote on? The percentage of fat in yoghurt, that kind of thing. It is ridiculous. It is given the task of the Supreme Soviet. The average MP can speak for six minutes per year in the Chamber. That is not a real parliament.

Transcript of Mr Bukovsky’s Brussels speech
Listen to it here

In 1992 I had unprecedented access to Politburo and Central Committee secret documents which have been classified, and still are even now, for 30 years. These documents show very clearly that the whole idea of turning the European common market into a federal state was agreed between the left-wing parties of Europe and Moscow as a joint project which [Soviet leader Mikhail] Gorbachev in 1988-89 called our “common European home.”

The idea was very simple. It first came up in 1985-86, when the Italian Communists visited Gorbachev, followed by the German Social-Democrats. They all complained that the changes in the world, particularly after [British Prime Minister Margaret] Thatcher introduced privatisation and economic liberalisation, were threatening to wipe out the achievement (as they called it) of generations of Socialists and Social-Democrats – threatening to reverse it completely. Therefore the only way to withstand this onslaught of wild capitalism (as they called it) was to try to introduce the same socialist goals in all countries at once. Prior to that, the left-wing parties and the Soviet Union had opposed European integration very much because they perceived it as a means to block their socialist goals. From 1985 onwards they completely changed their view. The Soviets came to a conclusion and to an agreement with the left-wing parties that if they worked together they could hijack the whole European project and turn it upside down. Instead of an open market they would turn it into a federal state.

According to the [secret Soviet] documents, 1985-86 is the turning point. I have published most of these documents. You might even find them on the internet. But the conversations they had are really eye opening. For the first time you understand that there is a conspiracy – quite understandable for them, as they were trying to save their political hides. In the East the Soviets needed a change of relations with Europe because they were entering a protracted and very deep structural crisis; in the West the left-wing parties were afraid of being wiped out and losing their influence and prestige. So it was a conspiracy, quite openly made by them, agreed upon, and worked out.

In January of 1989, for example, a delegation of the Trilateral Commission came to see Gorbachev. It included [former Japanese Prime Minister Yasuhiro] Nakasone, [former French President Valéry] Giscard d’Estaing, [American banker David] Rockefeller and [former US Secretary of State Henry] Kissinger. They had a very nice conversation where they tried to explain to Gorbachev that Soviet Russia had to integrate into the financial institutions of the world, such as Gatt, the IMF and the World Bank.

In the middle of it Giscard d’Estaing suddenly takes the floor and says: “Mr President, I cannot tell you exactly when it will happen – probably within 15 years – but Europe is going to be a federal state and you have to prepare yourself for that. You have to work out with us, and the European leaders, how you would react to that, how would you allow the other Easteuropean countries to interact with it or how to become a part of it, you have to be prepared.”

This was January 1989, at a time when the [1992] Maastricht treaty had not even been drafted. How the hell did Giscard d’Estaing know what was going to happen in 15 years time? And surprise, surprise, how did he become the author of the European constitution [in 2002-03]? A very good question. It does smell of conspiracy, doesn’t it?

Luckily for us the Soviet part of this conspiracy collapsed earlier and it did not reach the point where Moscow could influence the course of events. But the original idea was to have what they called a convergency, whereby the Soviet Union would mellow somewhat and become more social-democratic, while Western Europe would become social-democratic and socialist. Then there will be convergency. The structures have to fit each other. This is why the structures of the European Union were initially built with the purpose of fitting into the Soviet structure. This is why they are so similar in functioning and in structure.

It is no accident that the European Parliament, for example, reminds me of the Supreme Soviet. It looks like the Supreme Soviet because it was designed like it. Similary, when you look at the European Commission it looks like the Politburo. I mean it does so exactly, except for the fact that the Commission now has 25 members and the Politburo usually had 13 or 15 members. Apart from that they are exactly the same, unaccountable to anyone, not directly elected by anyone at all. When you look into all this bizarre activity of the European Union with its 80,000 pages of regulations it looks like Gosplan. We used to have an organisation which was planning everything in the economy, to the last nut and bolt, five years in advance. Exactly the same thing is happening in the EU. When you look at the type of EU corruption, it is exactly the Soviet type of corruption, going from top to bottom rather than going from bottom to top.

If you go through all the structures and features of this emerging European monster you will notice that it more and more resembles the Soviet Union. Of course, it is a milder version of the Soviet Union. Please, do not misunderstand me. I am not saying that it has a Gulag. It has no KGB – not yet – but I am very carefully watching such structures as Europol for example. That really worries me a lot because this organisation will probably have powers bigger than those of the KGB. They will have diplomatic immunity. Can you imagine a KGB with diplomatic immunity? They will have to police us on 32 kinds of crimes – two of which are particularly worrying, one is called racism, another is called xenophobia. No criminal court on earth defines anything like this as a crime [this is not entirely true, as Belgium already does so – pb]. So it is a new crime, and we have already been warned. Someone from the British government told us that those who object to uncontrolled immigration from the Third World will be regarded as racist and those who oppose further European integration will be regarded as xenophobes. I think Patricia Hewitt said this publicly.

Hence, we have now been warned. Meanwhile they are introducing more and more ideology. The Soviet Union used to be a state run by ideology. Today’s ideology of the European Union is social-democratic, statist, and a big part of it is also political correctness. I watch very carefully how political correctness spreads and becomes an oppressive ideology, not to mention the fact that they forbid smoking almost everywhere now. Look at this persecution of people like the Swedish pastor who was persecuted for several months because he said that the Bible does not approve homosexuality. France passed the same law of hate speech concerning gays. Britain is passing hate speech laws concerning race relations and now religious speech, and so on and so forth. What you observe, taken into perspective, is a systematic introduction of ideology which could later be enforced with oppressive measures. Apparently that is the whole purpose of Europol. Otherwise why do we need it? To me Europol looks very suspicious. I watch very carefully who is persecuted for what and what is happening, because that is one field in which I am an expert. I know how Gulags spring up.

It looks like we are living in a period of rapid, systematic and very consistent dismantlement of democracy. Look at this Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill. It makes ministers into legislators who can introduce new laws without bothering to tell Parliament or anyone. My immediate reaction is why do we need it? Britain survived two world wars, the war with Napoleon, the Spanish Armada, not to mention the Cold War, when we were told at any moment we might have a nuclear world war, without any need for introducing this kind legislation, without the need for suspending our civil liberaties and introducing emergency powers. Why do we need it right now? This can make a dictatorship out of your country in no time.

Today’s situation is really grim. Major political parties have been completely taken in by the new EU project. None of them really opposes it. They have become very corrupt. Who is going to defend our freedoms? It looks like we are heading towards some kind of collapse, some kind of crisis. The most likely outcome is that there will be an economic collapse in Europe, which in due time is bound to happen with this growth of expenses and taxes. The inability to create a competitive environment, the overregulation of the economy, the bureaucratisation, it is going to lead to economic collapse. Particularly the introduction of the euro was a crazy idea. Currency is not supposed to be political.

I have no doubt about it. There will be a collapse of the European Union pretty much like the Soviet Union collapsed. But do not forget that when these things collapse they leave such devastation that it takes a generation to recover. Just think what will happen if it comes to an economic crisis. The recrimination between nations will be huge. It might come to blows. Look to the huge number of immigrants from Third World countries now living in Europe. This was promoted by the European Union. What will happen with them if there is an economic collapse? We will probably have, like in the Soviet Union at the end, so much ethnic strife that the mind boggles. In no other country were there such ethnic tensions as in the Soviet Union, except probably in Yugoslavia. So that is exactly what will happen here, too. We have to be prepared for that. This huge edifice of bureaucracy is going to collapse on our heads.

This is why, and I am very frank about it, the sooner we finish with the EU the better. The sooner it collapses the less damage it will have done to us and to other countries. But we have to be quick because the Eurocrats are moving very fast. It will be difficult to defeat them. Today it is still simple. If one million people march on Brussels today these guys will run away to the Bahamas. If tomorrow half of the British population refuses to pay its taxes, nothing will happen and no-one will go to jail. Today you can still do that. But I do not know what the situation will be tomorrow with a fully fledged Europol staffed by former Stasi or Securitate officers. Anything may happen.

We are losing time. We have to defeat them. We have to sit and think, work out a strategy in the shortest possible way to achieve maximum effect. Otherwise it will be too late. So what should I say? My conclusion is not optimistic. So far, despite the fact that we do have some anti-EU forces in almost every country, it is not enough. We are losing and we are wasting time.

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/865

 

 

 

UNDIRLÖGÐ EVRÓPA Í NAZISTASTÍL?

Í eftirfarandi skjölum stendur að ólýðræðisleg samsetning Evrópusambandsins eigi rætur sínar í eftirstríðs-Nazisma fyrirætlunum um undirlagða Evrópu:

EU FACTS

The roots of the “Brussels EU”

Newly discovered documents reveal that the undemocratic structure of the “Brussels EU” has its roots in the post WWII plans of the IG Farben/Nazi-coalition in a conquered Europe.

Following are a few of the most important documents, to be used by teachers, politicians and anyone who is interested in preventing the “Brussels EU” from establishing a dictatorship of corporate interests in Europe.

http://www.eu-facts.org/en/roots/index.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1179902/Revealed-The-secret-report-shows-Nazis-planned-Fourth-Reich–EU.html

 

 

CZECH PRESIDENT WARNS AGAINST EUROPEANISM.

OUT STEFAN FULE.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stefan Füle should not interfere with Iceland´s internal affairs in Iceland, whether publicly or otherwise.  The vast majority of Iceland voters have absolutely no intention of ever joining the EU.  This is a private issue of one political party, that of Jóhanna and Össur and their 19% of voters.  The ridiculous application into the union which was forced through the Parliament on July 16, 2009 by this same flock should never have been accepted by the EU and should be stopped no later than now.  It is not Fule´s business what we feel about the union or whether we have ´delusions or fears´ about the union, per his article on October 14th in Morgunblaðið.  We do not need his education nor that of anyone else about the union.  Nor do we tolerate his interference.

PÓSTURINN HANS:
http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/fule/contact/commissioner/index_en.htm

99 PRÓSENTIN TAKA TIL SINNA RÁÐA.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nú er fólk út um allan heim búið að missa þolinmæðina gegn ofbeldi stjórnmálamanna gegn almenningi og yfirráðum 1 prósentsins, peningamanna heimsins yfir nánast öllu.  Og farið að mótmæla á götum úti.

Líka á Íslandi, en á Lækjartorgi var haldinn samstöðufundur með sömu mótmælum og fóru fram víða um heim samtímis.  1 prósentið ræður yfir afkomu og lífi fólks í gegnum spillta stjórnmálamenn sem bankar og fjárfestar og vogunarsjóðir hafa í vasanum. 

Nú þýðir það ekki að allir fjársterkir menn séu hluti af eyðingaröflunum eða ´vondir menn´, munum það allavega, en nógu stór hluti veldur eyðingu og spillingu lífs eins og við þekktum það.  Við getum ekki sætt okkur við það og ætlum ekki að sætta okkur við það.

Occupy movement goes global, turns violent

Occupy Wall Street Protest Brings Crowd to Times Square

Occupy Wall Street protests continue worldwide

Occupy Wall Street protests stepped up around the world‎  ‎‎

Occupy Wall Street Goes Global

'Occupy Wall St.' protest goes global

Occupy Wall Street Goes Global In Over 82 Countries
‎

Occupy the World: The '99 Percent' Movement Goes Global

‎

'Occupy Wall Street' Goes Global

 

 

 

 

 

Og NEI, við ætlum ekki að ´lenda ICESAVE´.  ICESAVE hefur verið lent.  Þið sem viljið borga kúgunina gerið það og haldið okkur hinum utan við það.

 

KOFI ANNAN, FORSETINN OG PALESTÍNURÍKI.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kofi Atta Annan og Ólafur Ragnar Grímsson, forseti Íslands.

Kofi Annan, fyrrum leiðtogi Sameinuðu Þjóðanna (United Nations) og friðarverðlaunahafi Nóbels, kom til landsins í dag í boði forsetans og HÍ.  Hann gat ekki sagt nei og endurskipulagði fyrirætlanir sínar, sagði hann á blaðamannafundi í dag með forsetanum á Bessastöðum. 

Hann sagði á sama blaðamannafundi að ´persónulega finnist honum að þeim ríkjum sem eigi fast sæti í öryggisráði Sameinuðu Þjóðanna beri söguleg, lagaleg og siðferðisleg skylda til að tryggja stofnun Palestínuríkis.  Til að hjálpa við að fullgilda ályktun 181.  Og honum finnist að þeir sem fjalli um málið hjá Sameinuðu Þjóðunum ættu að hafa það í huga, málsaðilarnir þurfi hjálp, alþjóðasamfélagið og Sameinuðu Þjóðirnar og fjórveldin verði að vinna með þeim við að leysa málið og tryggja að sjálfstætt ríki verði stofnað.´ 

Með orðum Annan: ´And I personally believe that the UN - and particularly the permanent members of the security council, have a historic, legal and moral obligation to finish the work that was started in 1948, to implement - to help implement fully resolution 181.  And I think those who will discuss this issue at the UN should bear this in mind.  The parties need help, they have been at the table for 20 years and we´ve seen no real progress.  So we need to - the international community and the UN and the Quartet - it has to work with them to resolve this issue to ensure that the second state is established´.

Persónulega get ég ekki nema verið hjartanlega sammála honum og öllum öðrum sem vilja sjálfstætt ríki Palestínu.  Og vil að öllu landi sem Ísrael stal af Palestínuþjóðinni með ófyrirgefanlegu ofbeldi og yfirgangi frá 1947 verði skilað.  Með valdi ef þarf. 

Menn sem afsaka kúgun og yfirgang Ísrael gegn Palestínu frá 1947 og vísa í biblíu eru ekki viðræðuhæfir í málinu.  Menn sem segja að Palestína eigi að vera í tvíhliða viðræðum við kúgara sinn, mættu setja sig í spor hersetinna og nánast hlekkjaðra og kúgaðra manna.  Hvað mundu þeir sjálfir gera ef þeir og börn þeirra sjálfra væru hlekkjuð og kúguð?  Og það í eigin landi? 

Gat ekki sagt nei

Lagaleg og siðferðisleg skylda

HIN ÞÖGLU MÓTMÆLI.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Landflótti hófst við fall bankanna og enn flýr fólk land af fullum þunga þrátt fyrir norrænu velferðarstjórnina.  Heilbrigðisstarfsmenn og þar með taldir læknar flýja í stríðum straumum og hefur talan nú SJÖ-faldast.  Og ástæðurnar eru lág laun miðað við norðurlöndin og önnur vestræn lönd, slæm vinnuaðstaða, geysilegt vinnuálag. 

Í frétt í Pressunni í nóvember í fyrra:

Læknasamtök skilja hvorki upp né niður í því hvers vegna ráðamenn hlusta ekki á viðvaranir um læknaflótta á Íslandi. Læknaskortur er yfirvofandi.


Í frétt í Svipunni frá september í fyrra:

Svipan átti samtal við lækni nýlega sem lýsti því að meira og minna allir læknar undir 55 ára aldri séu að leita sér að starfi erlendis. Sjálfur er hann að velja sér starf erlendis og veit persónulega af sérfræðingum, yfirlæknum og öðrum, meðal annars læknar á bráðamóttöku, sem eru aðeins að vinna uppsagnarfrestinn. Það eru hreinlega allir að leita sér að starfi annarsstaðar, pakka saman og fara, segir hann.
Eftir dóm hæstaréttar í lánamálum er engin önnur leið fyrir þetta fólk, það er ekki velkomið á Íslandi, hér er ekki hægt að koma sér fyrir með fjölskyldu. “Velferðarstjórnin” virðist enga grein gera sér fyrir því hvílík blóðtaka það er að hirða allar eigur af þeirri kynslóð sem átti að taka við framtíð landsins. Þessi kynslóð fer og kemur aldrei aftur.
En er það ekki einmitt það sem Alþjóðagjaldeyrissjóðurinn vill?

Jú, ætli það ekki?  Engan skildi undra.  En hvað finnst stjórnvöldum um landflóttann?  Hvað finnst ICESAVE-STJÓRNINNI?  Svaraði ekki Steingrímur bara að það fæddust alltaf nýir Íslendingar?  Er það þá í lagi að þúsundir á þúsundir ofan flýi föðurlandið bara ef það fæðast enn nýir Íslendingar?  Í það minnsta ekki ef færri koma til baka en fóru. 

Færeyingar töpuðu stórum hluta landsmanna sinna við svipaða erfiðleika og fæstir komu aftur.  Grænlendingar líka.  Oftast er það unga fólkið sem flýr.  Ætlum við að missa allt unga fólkið okkar úr landi?

Ekkert batna lífskjörin, skuldirnar rísa upp í himinhvolfið, enn missir fólk heimilin og vinnuna og fjölskyldur flosna upp.  Þó nokkrir hafa framið sjálfsvíg í örvæntingu.  

En þögul mótmæli fjöldans eru gríðarlega sterkt afl sem við getum notað á ríkisstjórn sem skilur ekkert og vill ekkert nema evru og ICESAVE.  Og miklu öflugri en ofbeldið og skrílslætin gegn saklausri lögreglu sem hafa of oft verið og hávaðinn og öskrin.  Læti fæla fólk í burtu frekar en hitt og ég hef verið að segja það.  Stjórnvöld neyðast til að taka okkur alvarlega með mætti fjöldans. 

Svona hafa Bandaríkjamenn lengi mótmælt á götum úti og náð langt, enda kæmust þeir ekkert upp með nein skrílslæti á almannafæri og yrði vikið af lögreglu.  Og mesta furða hvað íslenskir lögreglumenn eru vægir, standandi þarna í grjótregninu, enda nánast óvopnaðir og mikið undirmannaðir og illa verndaðir af hálfu stjórnvalda eins og sæmir. 

ÖSSUR.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ÖSSUR SKARPHÉÐINSSON. 

Einu sinni hafði ég þó nokkra trú á Össuri Skarphéðinssyni sem stjórnmálamanni.  En þá vissi ég ekki að hann ætti eftir að verða einn stórfelldasti óvinur okkar í fullveldismálum.  Hann hefur farið langt úr veginum í blekkingum og misbeitingu valds og mílur út fyrir sitt valdsvið við að þröngva okkur inni í miðstýringarbáknið ´European Union´ og gegn vilja stærri hluta þjóðarinnar.  Og ef við bætum við ICESAVE kúgunarsamningnum sem hann líka ætlaði okkur, lítur það illa út fyrir Össur og hans meðstjórnendur.

Hann og hans flokkur og stjórn eyða peningum úr ríkissjóði eins og við séum moldrík, ekki eins og um galtóman og skuldugan ríkiskassa sé að ræða.  Mætti halda að skattpeningar okkar væru rennandi vatn.

Núna er hann samt að fara hárrétta leið í samskiptum við Palestínu.  Við getum ekki horft þegjandi upp á kúgun og ofbeldi Ísrael gegn Palestínu.  Ísrael ætti að draga fyrir alþjóðadómstól fyrir glæpi gegn mannkyni og fyrst og síðast þvinga hrottaher Ísrael burt úr löglegu landi og lögsögu Palestínu.  Loks verður að taka stolið landið af þeim með góðu eða illu.

http://www.ruv.is/frett/palestinumenn-myndi-thjodstjorn

http://www.ruv.is/frett/island-og-palestina-gera-samkomulag

E.S.: Og bæti þessu við: http://www.ruv.is/flokkar/innlendar-frettir